nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 and HTTPS
From: joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:23:43 -0700
On 4/28/13 3:46 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
-- for example: large Cable providers getting together and agreeing to implement a 100ms RTT latency penalty for IPv4we do not see intentionally damaging our customers as a big sales feature. but we think all our competitors should do so.
This business is hard enough without deliberately breaking the customers.
randy
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jimmy Hess (Apr 28)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Owen DeLong (Apr 28)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jimmy Hess (Apr 28)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Owen DeLong (Apr 29)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jack Bates (Apr 29)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Owen DeLong (Apr 29)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jack Bates (Apr 29)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Owen DeLong (Apr 29)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jack Bates (Apr 29)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Michael Thomas (Apr 29)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS joel jaeggli (Apr 29)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Mark Andrews (Apr 28)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jimmy Hess (Apr 29)