nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent multi-hop BGP
From: Ryan Wilkins <ryan () deadfrog net>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:23:01 -0400
On Aug 28, 2013, at 10:20 AM, Tim Durack <tdurack () gmail com> wrote:
I was under the impression Cogent no longer did the multi-hop BGP thing, but then I got a copy of their NA user guide, and saw the peer-a/peer-b configuration. Not a fan. Anyone know if this is still required for Cogent IP transit service? (on/off list is fine.) -- Tim:>
For what it's worth, we started with Cogent doing the A/B peer thing when we were running IPv4 only with them. Once we added IPv6 BGP they migrated us to a direct peering. Much simpler and preferred. This is in Chicago at 710 Lakeshore. Ryan Wilkins
Current thread:
- Cogent multi-hop BGP Tim Durack (Aug 28)
- RE: Cogent multi-hop BGP Dennis Burgess (Aug 28)
- Re: Cogent multi-hop BGP Jon Lewis (Aug 28)
- Re: Cogent multi-hop BGP Ryan Wilkins (Aug 28)
- Re: Cogent multi-hop BGP Tim Durack (Aug 28)
- Re: Cogent multi-hop BGP Joe Maimon (Aug 29)