nanog mailing list archives
Re: Naive IPv6 (was AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO)
From: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 15:58:30 -0500
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson () gmail com> wrote:Except that we have a hard limit of 1M total, which after a few 100K fromwhere does the 1M come from?
FIB table sizes, usually dictated by TCAM size. Think deployed hardware, lots of it. (Most instances of TCAM share it for IPv4 + IPv6, with each slot on IPv6 taking two slots of TCAM, IIRC. And a few other things also consume TCAM, maybe not as significantly.) (Newer boxes may handle more on some network's cores, but I don't believe it is ubiquitously the case across the DFZ.) Brian
Current thread:
- Re: Naive IPv6 (was AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO), (continued)
- Re: Naive IPv6 (was AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO) Christopher Morrow (Dec 04)
- Re: Naive IPv6 (was AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO) Brian Dickson (Dec 04)
- Re: Naive IPv6 (was AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO) Christopher Morrow (Dec 04)
- Re: Naive IPv6 (was AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO) Christopher Morrow (Dec 04)
- Re: Naive IPv6 (was AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO) Brian Dickson (Dec 04)
- RE: Naive IPv6 (was AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO) Tony Hain (Dec 04)
- Re: Naive IPv6 (was AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO) Brian Dickson (Dec 04)
- Re: Naive IPv6 (was AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO) Christopher Morrow (Dec 04)
- Re: Naive IPv6 (was AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO) Brian Dickson (Dec 04)
- Re: Naive IPv6 (was AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO) Christopher Morrow (Dec 04)
- Re: Naive IPv6 (was AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO) Brian Dickson (Dec 04)
- Re: Naive IPv6 (was AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO) joel jaeggli (Dec 04)
- Re: Naive IPv6 (was AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO) Christopher Morrow (Dec 04)