nanog mailing list archives
Re: blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6
From: Michael Smith <mksmith () mac com>
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 09:30:42 -0800
On Dec 7, 2013, at 8:26 AM, jamie rishaw <j () arpa com> wrote:
(A little late but) it's reachable for me -- Funny tho that something at cisco is IPv6 via a v4<->v6 (2001::) :-) jamie
Huh? 2001:4800::/29 is owned by Rackspace. It's native all the way from "here" anyway. Mike
Current thread:
- blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6 Henri Wahl (Dec 04)
- Re: blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6 Jared Mauch (Dec 04)
- RE: blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6 Frank Bulk (Dec 04)
- Re: blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6 Mark Townsley (Dec 05)
- RE: blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6 John Stuppi (jstuppi) (Dec 05)
- RE: blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6 Rogan Schlassa (Dec 05)
- Re: blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6 Richard Porter (Dec 05)
- Re: blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6 Geraint Jones (Dec 05)
- Re: blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6 jamie rishaw (Dec 07)
- Re: blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6 Michael Smith (Dec 07)
- Re: blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6 Jared Mauch (Dec 07)
- Re: blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6 jamie rishaw (Dec 07)
- RE: blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6 Frank Bulk (Dec 04)
- Re: blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6 Jared Mauch (Dec 04)
- Re: blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6 Jay Hennigan (Dec 09)