nanog mailing list archives
Re: [nznog] Web Servers: Dual-homing or DNAT/Port Forwarding?
From: Tim Franklin <tim () pelican org>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:21:49 +0000 (GMT)
Just because something is public doesn¹t mean you have to accept ALL traffic, it just means you have to anticipate any potential problems based on Larry knowing your address rather than imagining him standing at the front gate of your gated community. ;) (let¹s torture that analogy!)
There's still a gated community? I thought that particular piece of routing joy was long gone... Sorry, I'll get my coat. Tim.
Current thread:
- Re: [nznog] Web Servers: Dual-homing or DNAT/Port Forwarding? Alex White-Robinson (Dec 10)
- Re: [nznog] Web Servers: Dual-homing or DNAT/Port Forwarding? Geraint Jones (Dec 10)
- Re: [nznog] Web Servers: Dual-homing or DNAT/Port Forwarding? cb.list6 (Dec 10)
- Re: [nznog] Web Servers: Dual-homing or DNAT/Port Forwarding? Jared Mauch (Dec 10)
- Re: [nznog] Web Servers: Dual-homing or DNAT/Port Forwarding? Jay Nugent (Dec 10)
- Re: [nznog] Web Servers: Dual-homing or DNAT/Port Forwarding? cb.list6 (Dec 10)
- Re: [nznog] Web Servers: Dual-homing or DNAT/Port Forwarding? Geraint Jones (Dec 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [nznog] Web Servers: Dual-homing or DNAT/Port Forwarding? Larry Sheldon (Dec 10)
- Re: [nznog] Web Servers: Dual-homing or DNAT/Port Forwarding? Geraint Jones (Dec 10)
- Re: [nznog] Web Servers: Dual-homing or DNAT/Port Forwarding? Sholes, Joshua (Dec 11)
- Re: [nznog] Web Servers: Dual-homing or DNAT/Port Forwarding? Tim Franklin (Dec 11)
- Message not available
- Re: [nznog] Web Servers: Dual-homing or DNAT/Port Forwarding? Larry Sheldon (Dec 11)
- Re: [nznog] Web Servers: Dual-homing or DNAT/Port Forwarding? cb.list6 (Dec 11)