nanog mailing list archives
Re: ddos attacks
From: Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:03:59 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:12:28 -0800, "cb.list6" said:I am strongly considering having my upstreams to simply rate limit ipv4 UDP. It is the simplest solution that is proactive.What are the prospects for ipv6 UDP not suffering the same fate?
Roughly 0%, but there's so little v6 traffic compared to v4, you probably don't have to worry about v6 attack traffic yet...particularly if you're not dual stack yet. :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route | therefore you are _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
Current thread:
- Re: ddos attacks Dan White (Dec 18)
- Re: ddos attacks Paul Stewart (Dec 18)
- Re: ddos attacks Peter Phaal (Dec 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ddos attacks cb.list6 (Dec 18)
- Re: ddos attacks Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 18)
- Re: ddos attacks Jon Lewis (Dec 18)
- RE: ddos attacks James Braunegg (Dec 18)
- Re: ddos attacks Tore Anderson (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks Eugeniu Patrascu (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks Adrian M (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks Paul Ferguson (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 18)
- Re: ddos attacks Dobbins, Roland (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks Nick Hilliard (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks Dobbins, Roland (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks Nick Hilliard (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks Dobbins, Roland (Dec 19)