nanog mailing list archives
Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO
From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon () cox net>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 22:21:45 -0600
On 12/2/2013 7:41 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
--- owen () delong com wrote: From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> I actually tend to doubt it. All of the people I've talked to from the major operators have said that the charges in IPv4 were not a revenue source, they were an effort to discourage the consumption of the addresses and/or the use of static addresses and to try and recover the costs of dealing with them in cases where customers were willing to pay.
Do you know to what charity they donate everything in excess of their costs? -- Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics of System Administrators: Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to learn from their mistakes. (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)
Current thread:
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO, (continued)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Owen DeLong (Dec 02)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Rob Seastrom (Dec 02)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Owen DeLong (Dec 02)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Eric Oosting (Dec 02)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Cutler James R (Dec 02)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Rob Seastrom (Dec 03)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Seth Mos (Dec 03)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Randy Bush (Dec 02)