RE: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

[Eric Wieling <EWieling () nyigc com>]

In the past the ISP simply needed a nice big ATM pipe to the ILEC for DSL service.   The ILEC provided a PVC from the 
customer endpoint to the ISP.  As understand it this is no longer the case, but only because of non-technical issues.

We currently use XO, Covad, etc to connect to the customer   We get a fiber connection to them and the provide use L2 
connectivity to the custom endpoint using an Ethernet VLAN, Frame Relay PVC, etc complete with QoS.   I assume XO, etc 
use UNE access to the local loop.   There is no reason a Muni can't do something similar.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Masataka Ohta [mailto:mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 7:17 PM
To: Scott Helms
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

> note that a phone company often had
> several central offices to cover their territory in the time before 
> there were remotes (Digital Loop Carriers).

Each CO has its own MDF, where competing ISPs must have their routers.

No different from competing ISPs using DSL or PON.