nanog mailing list archives

Re: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network


From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 15:11:18 -0500 (EST)

----- Original Message -----
From: "fredrik danerklint" <fredan-nanog () fredan se>

It would do little good; my hit rate on such a cache would be
unlikely to be high enough to merit the traffic to keep it charged.

(Children watching a movie only once? Not a chance. It's more like
unlimited number of times and then some more...).

"DVD's."

"MythTV"

So don't set-up an cache server at your home/residence.

I probably won't. 

But it has become unclear what your fundamental premise and argument are,
by this point in the game.

Is it: "it is bad that content providers choose a business and technical
model wherein local in-home transparent caching proxies won't work?"

Cause that's a non-starter.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra () baylink com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com         2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA               #natog                      +1 727 647 1274


Current thread: