nanog mailing list archives
Re: bgp for ipv6 question
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:18:24 -0800
On Feb 14, 2013, at 12:58 , Karl Auer <kauer () biplane com au> wrote:
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 08:08 -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:I recommend keeping your network as congruent between IPv4 and IPv6 as possible, with dual-stack.Why?
For one thing, doing otherwise violates the principle of least astonishment. Other reasons include simplified network diagrams, improved reliability, easier troubleshooting, reduced complexity, and often lower costs of operations. Owen
Current thread:
- bgp for ipv6 question Deric Kwok (Feb 14)
- Re: bgp for ipv6 question Jared Mauch (Feb 14)
- Re: bgp for ipv6 question fredrik danerklint (Feb 14)
- Re: bgp for ipv6 question Alain Hebert (Feb 14)
- Re: bgp for ipv6 question Karl Auer (Feb 14)
- Re: bgp for ipv6 question Owen DeLong (Feb 14)
- Re: bgp for ipv6 question Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 21)
- Re: bgp for ipv6 question John Osmon (Feb 14)
- Re: bgp for ipv6 question fredrik danerklint (Feb 14)
- Re: bgp for ipv6 question Jared Mauch (Feb 14)
- Re: bgp for ipv6 question Job Snijders (Feb 14)