nanog mailing list archives
Re: TelePacific a good choice?
From: Jared Geiger <jared () compuwizz net>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:16:26 -0500
We have a customer who used them for IP transit at an office in San Francisco. They seemed to have issues with International peering. Traffic to Asia / Australia seemed to be bottlenecked. This was a year ago and the bottleneck was between TelePacific and Global Crossing at the time. The customer has moved to another provider and no longer has issues. ~Jared On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Mike Hale <eyeronic.design () gmail com>wrote:
I've used them at a previous employer, mainly for PRI termination but also for some transit and colo services. They were decent. Didn't have any major complaints. If IPv6 is important for you...per what Paul said, they probably wouldn't be your best choice. If IPv6 doesn't matter to you, they're good enough. On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Paul WALL <pauldotwall () gmail com> wrote:The lack of IPv6 implementation: http://bgp.he.net/AS14265#_asinfo should be the only feedback you need. On 2/19/13, Jeff Harper <jharper () well com> wrote:Hiya, We're looking at TelePacific as a possible solution for some of ourtransitneeds. If you have an honest experience with them, positive ornegative,I'd like to hear from you. Simply email me off line with your experiences, thanks! Jeff Harper, CCIE (W) | www.well.com ip access-list extended jeff permit tcp any any eq intelligence deny tcp any any eq stupid-people-- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
Current thread:
- TelePacific a good choice? Jeff Harper (Feb 19)
- Re: TelePacific a good choice? Paul WALL (Feb 19)
- Re: TelePacific a good choice? Mike Hale (Feb 19)
- Re: TelePacific a good choice? Jared Geiger (Feb 20)
- Re: TelePacific a good choice? Mike Hale (Feb 19)
- Re: TelePacific a good choice? Paul WALL (Feb 19)