Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs

[Joe Abley <jabley () hopcount ca>]

On 2013-02-22, at 14:01, Andrew Sullivan <asullivan () dyn com> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 04:57:42PM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > RFC 952 as modified by RFC 1123 describe the legal syntax of a hostname.
> > There is no trailing period.
>
> Mark is of course correct about this, but it doesn't fully help.
>
> The basic problem is (as always) the confusion about the difference
> between a hostname and a fully-qualified domain name, which so happens
> to be also a hostname.

Actually, I think the problem is the confusion between a label string terminated in a dot (to indicate that no search 
domain should be appended) and a label string not so-terminated (which might mean that a search domain is attempted, 
depending on local configuration).

There is no simple terminology to distinguish between the two cases that I am aware of.

I think the original question's context was how to format a CN in a CSR. I believe the most useful answer is "single 
CN, fully-qualified domain name with no trailing dot".

The terminology "root zone" or "root domain" to explain the trailing dot is misleading and unhelpful, I find.


Joe