nanog mailing list archives
Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs
From: Brian Reichert <reichert () numachi com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:49:41 -0500
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:18:00PM -0500, Jay Ashworth wrote:
If I understood Brian correctly, his problem is that people/programs are trying to retrieve things from, eg: https://my.host.name./this/is/a/path and the SSL library fails the certificate match if the cert doesn't contain the absolute domain name as an altName -- because *the browser* (or whatever) does not normalize before calling the library.
I'd argue that if you have an absolute domain name, then that _is_ the 'normalized' form of the domain name; it's an unambigious representation of the domain name. (Here, I'm treating the string as a serialized data structure.) Choosing to remove the notion of "this is rooted", and then asking any (all?) other layers to handle the introduced ambiguity sounds like setting yourself up for the issues that RFC 1535 was drawing attention to.
Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra () baylink com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274
-- Brian Reichert <reichert () numachi com> BSD admin/developer at large
Current thread:
- Re: Should host/domain names travel over the internet with a trailing dot?, (continued)
- Re: Should host/domain names travel over the internet with a trailing dot? Mark Andrews (Feb 25)
- Re: Should host/domain names travel over the internet with a trailing dot? Brian Reichert (Feb 25)
- Re: Should host/domain names travel over the internet with a trailing dot? Jay Ashworth (Feb 25)
- Re: Should host/domain names travel over the internet with a trailing dot? Jimmy Hess (Feb 25)
- Re: Should host/domain names travel over the internet with a trailing dot? Jay Ashworth (Feb 25)
- Re: Should host/domain names travel over the internet with a trailing dot? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 26)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Owen DeLong (Feb 25)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs David Miller (Feb 25)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Jay Ashworth (Feb 25)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Owen DeLong (Feb 25)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Brian Reichert (Feb 25)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Doug Barton (Feb 25)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Brian Reichert (Feb 25)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Jay Ashworth (Feb 25)
- Message not available
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Brian Reichert (Feb 22)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Andrew Sullivan (Feb 22)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Rich Kulawiec (Feb 22)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Jay Ashworth (Feb 22)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Mark Andrews (Feb 23)