nanog mailing list archives
Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats
From: Barry Shein <bzs () world std com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:42:21 -0500
ARGH, ok, enough with: They can have any policy they like, it's their equipment and no one is being forced to use them. That's tacit, I'd hope. Doesn't mean people can't do dopey things well within their rights and maybe sounding it out would give them some clue, or at least warn others to stay away, tho I'd agree NANOG is probably not the right venue. -- -Barry Shein The World | bzs () TheWorld com | http://www.TheWorld.com Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD | Dial-Up: US, PR, Canada Software Tool & Die | Public Access Internet | SINCE 1989 *oo*
Current thread:
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats, (continued)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Måns Nilsson (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats John Levine (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Robert Bonomi (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Tony Finch (Jan 11)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats JP Viljoen (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Owen DeLong (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Julian DeMarchi (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Rich Kulawiec (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Barry Shein (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Julian DeMarchi (Jan 09)