nanog mailing list archives
Re: Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:52:07 -0500
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg () tristatelogic com> wrote:
After a careful investigation, I am of the opinion that each of the following 18 ASNs was registered (via RIPE) with fradulent information purporting to represent the identity of the true registrant, and that in fact, all 18 of these ASNs were registered by a single party, apparently as part of a larger scheme to provide IP space to various snowshoe spammers.
Ronald, What is your goal here? Is there some action that any particular NANOG participant should take based on your opinion? Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com bill () herrin us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
Current thread:
- Re: Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs, (continued)
- Re: Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs Todd Underwood (Jan 16)
- Re: Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs Rich Kulawiec (Jan 16)
- Re: Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs Todd Underwood (Jan 16)
- Re: Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs William Herrin (Jan 16)
- Re: Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 16)
- Re: Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs Rich Kulawiec (Jan 17)
- Re: Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs Matthew Petach (Jan 16)
- Re: Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs Carlos M. Martinez (Jan 16)
- Re: Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs Steven G. Huter (Jan 16)
- Re: Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs Ronald F. Guilmette (Jan 16)