nanog mailing list archives
Re: box against dos/ddos
From: Kenneth McRae <kenneth.mcrae () dreamhost com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:47:03 -0800
I think Radware has to sit inline. I do not believe they offer BGP offramp, so keep that in mind. On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Jay Coley <j () jcoley net> wrote:
+1 for Radware On 31/01/2013 18:36, dennis wrote:Agreed, my shortlist for evaluation would include Arbor, Radware and Genie NRM. New players to the market include just about every IPS and application load balancing solution out there. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists () gmail com> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 10:23 AM To: "Piotr" <piotr.1234 () interia pl> Cc: <nanog () nanog org> Subject: Re: box against dos/ddosarbor peakflow to start with? On Thursday, January 31, 2013, Piotr wrote:Hi, I looking some box (vendor, model), which i can put out of the main/product network, which can analyze packets netflow,sflow,syslog from bgp router(s) and after discover some anomaly it can do some action,forexample: - Box have bgp session with bgp router and advertise attacked ip prefix with some community. Bgp router set next-hop for this prefix to /dev/null Normal traffic via bgp router is about 1G/s in and 10G/s out What is worth of looking and what you suggest ? thanks for help, Piotr-- --srs (iPad)
Current thread:
- box against dos/ddos Piotr (Jan 31)
- Re: box against dos/ddos Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 31)
- Re: box against dos/ddos Kenneth McRae (Jan 31)
- Re: box against dos/ddos dennis (Jan 31)
- Re: box against dos/ddos Jay Coley (Jan 31)
- Re: box against dos/ddos Kenneth McRae (Jan 31)
- Re: box against dos/ddos Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 31)
- Re: box against dos/ddos Carlos Kamtha (Jan 31)
- RE: box against dos/ddos Dixon, Justin (Jan 31)