nanog mailing list archives
Re: Webcasting as a replacement for traditional broadcasting (was Re: Wackie 'ol Friday)
From: "cb.list6" <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2013 10:37:48 -0700
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Warren Bailey <wbailey () satelliteintelligencegroup com> wrote:
Japan has been doing this exact thing for close to 10 years.. Why is it hard
Japan has been doing what exactly? Can you cite it? I am pretty sure by "exact thing" you do not mean EMBMS.
to do? Buffer the video 30 seconds or use a codec that doesn't blow? I use my phone via "4G"and stream media constantly. If you take a look at Charlie
Yes, and by "streaming", you mean downloading discrete video chunks with http. That is the state of the industry today video over unicast TCP / HTTP. It is not EMBMS A very large percentage of mobile data traffic today is video via HTTP http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns341/ns525/ns537/ns705/ns827/white_paper_c11-520862.html I do not know of any EMBMS deployments. CB
Ergen's behavior lately, there won't need to be a lte tv.. Lightsquared is about to be murdered for breaking the Gps and dish will take over as largest provider in the US. Now taking bets. Sent from my Mobile Device. -------- Original message -------- From: "cb.list6" <cb.list6 () gmail com> Date: 06/08/2013 9:52 AM (GMT-08:00) To: Brandon Butterworth <brandon () rd bbc co uk> Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Webcasting as a replacement for traditional broadcasting (was Re: Wackie 'ol Friday) On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Brandon Butterworth <brandon () rd bbc co uk> wrote:I was at an incentive auction discussion earlier in the week where it was suggested that the broadcasters see a rosy future with ATSC beaming to mobile, but there is still work to be done.They might wish, after many years there has been little take up of the various systems created to do this (we've spent quite some time working on the standards). Nobody wanted to pay for it to be in handsets, other features were seen as more important uses of the space/power. The next try is LTE Broadcast http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMBMSWithout going into painful detail on the policy, technology or economics, i really don't see EMBMS being widely deployed and successful Not to say some folks won't try to make pigs fly. Vendors make a lot of money at the "pigs flying" BU. I do imagine the invisible hand of tariffs guiding users to better use broadcast TV and Radio for live events. CBbrandon
Current thread:
- Re: Webcasting as a replacement for traditional broadcasting (was Re: Wackie 'ol Friday) Brandon Butterworth (Jun 08)
- Re: Webcasting as a replacement for traditional broadcasting (was Re: Wackie 'ol Friday) cb.list6 (Jun 08)
- Re: Webcasting as a replacement for traditional broadcasting (was Re: Wackie 'ol Friday) Warren Bailey (Jun 08)
- Re: Webcasting as a replacement for traditional broadcasting (was Re: Wackie 'ol Friday) cb.list6 (Jun 08)
- Re: Webcasting as a replacement for traditional broadcasting (was Re: Wackie 'ol Friday) Jay Ashworth (Jun 08)
- Re: Webcasting as a replacement for traditional broadcasting (was Re: Wackie 'ol Friday) Eric Adler (Jun 09)
- Re: Webcasting as a replacement for traditional broadcasting (was Re: Wackie 'ol Friday) Jean-Francois Mezei (Jun 09)
- Re: Webcasting as a replacement for traditional broadcasting (was Re: Wackie 'ol Friday) Michael Painter (Jun 09)
- Re: Webcasting as a replacement for traditional broadcasting (was Re: Wackie 'ol Friday) Jay Ashworth (Jun 09)
- Re: Webcasting as a replacement for traditional broadcasting (was Re: Wackie 'ol Friday) Michael Painter (Jun 10)
- Re: Webcasting as a replacement for traditional broadcasting (was Re: Wackie 'ol Friday) Rajiv Asati (rajiva) (Jun 11)
- Re: Webcasting as a replacement for traditional broadcasting (was Re: Wackie 'ol Friday) Warren Bailey (Jun 08)
- Re: Webcasting as a replacement for traditional broadcasting (was Re: Wackie 'ol Friday) cb.list6 (Jun 08)