nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP4 address conservation method
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 18:11:20 +0200 (CEST)
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, William Herrin wrote:
Both the router and host have to support sending and accepting invalid ARP requests. Since the Linux kernel already mishandles arp by default, you're probably begging for unexpected behavior. Double down on that if the customer controls the server image.
Exactly what is wrong with the ARP answers and requests sent using local-proxy-arp?
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- IP4 address conservation method Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 04)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Dan White (Jun 05)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Blake Hudson (Jun 06)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Tore Anderson (Jun 06)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Blake Hudson (Jun 06)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method William Herrin (Jun 05)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 05)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method William Herrin (Jun 05)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 05)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Dan White (Jun 05)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 05)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Dan White (Jun 05)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Ricky Beam (Jun 05)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method William Herrin (Jun 05)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Bjørn Mork (Jun 06)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method William Herrin (Jun 06)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Jimmy Hess (Jun 06)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method William Herrin (Jun 06)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Bjørn Mork (Jun 07)