nanog mailing list archives
Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:29:07 -0400
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:02:29 +0100, you said:
The DIYbio community is perfectly harmless so far. The feds are already breathing down their necks, so there's no really no point in adding gratuitious gasoline to the fire.
"The Feds" have jurisdiction in Yemen, North Korea, Iran, and other places like that? That's a relief, I'm glad to see we've actually got a way to stop those places that engage in constant sabre-rattling....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Jay Ashworth (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Miles Fidelman (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Owen DeLong (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Jay Ashworth (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Eugen Leitl (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Miles Fidelman (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Patrick (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Owen DeLong (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Reply-To: Patrick (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Jimmy Hess (Mar 18)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Jay Ashworth (Mar 18)