nanog mailing list archives
Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification
From: Arturo Servin <arturo.servin () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 12:09:39 -0300
Masataka, Do you have data to support your claim? I would said that poor BCP38 deployment it is because a lack of economical incentive. I have only empirical data to support my claim though (which is private conversations with ISPs not doing it and saying that they do not see a cost effective advantage). Regards, as On 3/18/13 12:02 PM, Masataka Ohta wrote:
Current poor support for multihomed sites is a reason why BCP38 is not operational.
Current thread:
- Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification], (continued)
- Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification] Owen DeLong (Mar 20)
- Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification] John Curran (Mar 20)
- Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification] Owen DeLong (Mar 20)
- Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification] Jimmy Hess (Mar 22)
- Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification] William Herrin (Mar 20)
- Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification] Brielle Bruns (Mar 20)
- Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification] Andrew D Kirch (Mar 20)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification David Conrad (Mar 20)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Sander Steffann (Mar 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Masataka Ohta (Mar 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Arturo Servin (Mar 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Arturo Servin (Mar 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Joe Abley (Mar 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Masataka Ohta (Mar 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Arturo Servin (Mar 18)