nanog mailing list archives

Re: Class E addresses in the wild


From: "cb.list6" <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:10:33 -0700

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:06 PM, George Herbert
<george.herbert () gmail com> wrote:
It is (or was) fairly commonly in use among internal nets which
overflowed RFC 1918 or have to internetwork with other heavy users of
RFC 1918 space.  I know of at least two service providers and one cell
network who were using it for that 3 years ago.


I am pretty sure Class E is completely defunct and not used anywhere
since Cisco and Juniper routers do not forward the packets (circa 2008
testing) and no known host accept it as a valid address, AFAIK.

CB

Someone leaking internal routes for such?  Or attempt to hijack the space?

Only the Shadow knows...


On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3 () gmail com> wrote:
No authorized IETF use that I know of. See
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ipv4-address-space.xml

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3 () gmail com


On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Buz Dale <buzdale () gmail com> wrote:
Is anyone else seeing a lot of Class E address space (240.0.0.0/4) at their
borders?  Has this space been reinstated in some as yet unknown to me RFC?
Thanks,
Buz

--
Buz Dale
buzdale () gmail com
GMT -5
--



--
Buz Dale
buzdale () gmail com
GMT -5
--




--
-george william herbert
george.herbert () gmail com



Current thread: