nanog mailing list archives

Re: How anti-NSA backlash could fracture the Internet along national borders - The Washington Post


From: Jorge Amodio <jmamodio () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 05:37:41 -0600

This is not 100% true, the economics of hosting and providing layer 7
services are not longer strictly defined by geographic boundaries, also
some local companies (global or not) provide services locally regardless of
the location (or multiple locations) of the servers.

There is no field on the IP packet header to indicate to which political
mandate the packet belongs.

-Jorge



On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:48 AM, Masataka Ohta <
mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp> wrote:

John Levine wrote:

I expect we'll hear lots of pontification, quietly fading away when
someone explains to the pontificators just how expensive it would be
to do what they want, and ask where the money is coming from.

For countries other than US, mandating domestic servers prevents
money going away to US through US based companies.

It is expensive only for those having foreign servers, which
nullifies advantages of global service companies over domestic
ones.

                                                Masataka Ohta




Current thread: