nanog mailing list archives
RE: OT: Below grade fiber interconnect points
From: Joe McLeod <jmcleod () musfiber net>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 13:28:11 +0000
Your only other real option would be to deploy a "road-side" cabinet which has environmental controls... https://www.google.com/search?q=roadside+cabinets&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=f8-EUqHNOdPqkQe32IHABw&ved=0CEsQsAQ&biw=1620&bih=735 Thanks, Joe -----Original Message----- From: Justin M. Streiner [mailto:streiner () cluebyfour org] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 9:05 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: OT: Below grade fiber interconnect points On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Roy Hockett wrote:
Thank you for comments. Let me clarify the situation. We have a building that has been fiber cross connect location and is being demolished. This location has about 20 fiber cable entering where we patch between fiber paths. If we relocated these cross connect field to another building and that build is demolished we have to do this all over again, so the desire was to have an independent facility for the fiber cross connect field, but I am guessing due to esthetics the below ground vault was selected, we just learned of this selection and thus my query to this group to find other that have dealt with similar situations and if so, experience base recommendations, and things to be aware of.
If the vault has a controlled environment and access, similar to what you would find inside of a comms room, that's one thing. If it's more like a typical manhole (damp, dirty, dark, possible temperature extremes, other utilities/hazards), then the only thing that should be in there is a water-tight splice case. Fiber patches need to be in a clean environment. Did this project provide any funds for relocation or replacement of the communications facilities that would be lost due to the demolition? We've gone through this many times on our campus. jms -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Current thread:
- OT: Below grade fiber interconnect points Roy hockett (Nov 13)
- Re: OT: Below grade fiber interconnect points Justin M. Streiner (Nov 13)
- Re: OT: Below grade fiber interconnect points Thomas (Nov 13)
- Re: OT: Below grade fiber interconnect points Jeff Kell (Nov 13)
- Re: OT: Below grade fiber interconnect points Roy Hockett (Nov 13)
- Re: OT: Below grade fiber interconnect points Justin M. Streiner (Nov 13)
- Re: OT: Below grade fiber interconnect points Thomas (Nov 14)
- RE: OT: Below grade fiber interconnect points Sam Roche (Nov 14)
- RE: OT: Below grade fiber interconnect points Joe McLeod (Nov 14)
- Re: OT: Below grade fiber interconnect points Shawn L (Nov 14)
- Re: OT: Below grade fiber interconnect points Thomas (Nov 13)
- Re: OT: Below grade fiber interconnect points William Allen Simpson (Nov 14)
- Re: OT: Below grade fiber interconnect points Justin M. Streiner (Nov 13)
- Re: OT: Below grade fiber interconnect points Jay Ashworth (Nov 15)
- Re: OT: Below grade fiber interconnect points Michael Sinatra (Nov 15)
- Re: OT: Below grade fiber interconnect points Jay Ashworth (Nov 15)
- Re: OT: Below grade fiber interconnect points Gary Buhrmaster (Nov 15)
- Re: OT: Below grade fiber interconnect points Michael Sinatra (Nov 15)
- Re: OT: Below grade fiber interconnect points Jay Ashworth (Nov 15)