nanog mailing list archives
Re: Question on routing of Tata AS6453 with their other network AS4755
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 13:17:07 -0500
On Nov 18, 2013, at 3:01 AM, Anurag Bhatia <me () anuragbhatia com> wrote:
Heu Michael But this time AS4755 wasn't their customer. It's their own network in India! I think probably it will be hard for us and in general for technical community to comment on business side of it but I am just curious on technical side on what it is like that? Is it missing iBGP sessions or just intentional filtering of a group of prefixes via a peer group or based on some community tag?
It's hard to tell what the right answer is without the prefix and diagnosing the problem from multiple locations. Collecting data from various looking glasses in multiple cities and regions is always helpful to triangulate what is going on. - Jared
Current thread:
- Question on routing of Tata AS6453 with their other network AS4755 Anurag Bhatia (Nov 16)
- Re: Question on routing of Tata AS6453 with their other network AS4755 Erik Bais (Nov 16)
- Re: Question on routing of Tata AS6453 with their other network AS4755 Michael Smith (Nov 17)
- Re: Question on routing of Tata AS6453 with their other network AS4755 Anurag Bhatia (Nov 18)
- Re: Question on routing of Tata AS6453 with their other network AS4755 Jared Mauch (Nov 18)
- Re: Question on routing of Tata AS6453 with their other network AS4755 Anurag Bhatia (Nov 18)