nanog mailing list archives
Re: 3rd party transit for anycast services?
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 23:19:45 -0500
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Carlos Kamtha <kamtha () ak-labs net> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:14:10PM -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:Not an option atm. we do not have control over layer 3 and we do not currently own a CIDR block and, our BGP sessions are done with reserved 655xx ASN to our provider.isn't that sort of fixable with a simple request to your local RIR?it is.. request in progress..
great, then... you'll be able to turn up services whenever/whereever you want shortly. congrats!
Current thread:
- 3rd party transit for anycast services? Carlos Kamtha (Nov 27)
- Re: 3rd party transit for anycast services? Bill Woodcock (Nov 27)
- Re: 3rd party transit for anycast services? Carlos Kamtha (Nov 27)
- Re: 3rd party transit for anycast services? Christopher Morrow (Nov 27)
- Re: 3rd party transit for anycast services? Carlos Kamtha (Nov 27)
- Re: 3rd party transit for anycast services? Christopher Morrow (Nov 27)
- Re: 3rd party transit for anycast services? Carlos Kamtha (Nov 27)
- Re: 3rd party transit for anycast services? Bill Woodcock (Nov 27)