nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 69, Issue 28
From: Fred Reimer <freimer () freimer org>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 18:55:01 +0000
Centralized management / control plane. Kind of the reverse of widely dispersed per-node policy based routing. On 10/11/13 2:47 PM, "Vytautas V Grigaliunas" <vyto () fnal gov> wrote:
What is SDN at its essence ?Message: 9 Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 19:13:57 +0100 (BST) From: William Waites <wwaites () tardis ed ac uk> To: joelja () bogus com Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Policy-based routing is evil? Discuss. Message-ID: <20131011.191357.239591912.wwaites () tardis ed ac uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:41:46 -0700, joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com> said: > you take all the useful information that an IGP could be (or is) > providing you, and then you ignore it and do something else. Yes, that's another part of the conversation, encouraging the use of an IGP, which has been a source of trouble for them because of broken wireless bridges from a very commonly used vendor that randomly eat multicast packets, so it's not as straightforward as it should be. > evil is not a synonym for ugly patch placed over a problem that > could be handled better. Ok, fair enough. My first experience with PBR was as a summer intern in the mid-1990s who inherited management of a large ATM network that had a big VPN-esque thing built entirely that way and with no documentation. It certainly felt evil at the time. ;) -w -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
Current thread:
- RE: NANOG Digest, Vol 69, Issue 28 Vytautas V Grigaliunas (Oct 11)
- Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 69, Issue 28 Fred Reimer (Oct 11)