nanog mailing list archives
Re: Regarding source based outbound routing (with redundancy)
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 12:45:12 -0400
you really don't want to do policy routing :( On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Anurag Bhatia <me () anuragbhatia com> wrote:
Hello there! I am trying to do a source based outbound routing between multiple upstreams. Usually I picked outbound via localpref but here I wish to use Provider 1 for say 10.10.10.0/24 while provider 2 for small chunk of it say 10.10.10.0/28. I wish to keep failover support and thus so if provider 2 fails, I wish to push traffic again via Provider 1. Is this is possible only with VRF or I can push for some specific match rule in route maps? Thanks. -- Anurag Bhatia anuragbhatia.com Linkedin <http://in.linkedin.com/in/anuragbhatia21> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/anurag_bhatia> Skype: anuragbhatia.com
Current thread:
- Regarding source based outbound routing (with redundancy) Anurag Bhatia (Oct 05)
- Re: Regarding source based outbound routing (with redundancy) Christopher Morrow (Oct 05)
- Re: Regarding source based outbound routing (with redundancy) joel jaeggli (Oct 05)
- Re: Regarding source based outbound routing (with redundancy) Christopher Morrow (Oct 05)
- Re: Regarding source based outbound routing (with redundancy) joel jaeggli (Oct 05)
- Re: Regarding source based outbound routing (with redundancy) Fred Reimer (Oct 05)
- Re: Regarding source based outbound routing (with redundancy) Anurag Bhatia (Oct 08)
- Re: Regarding source based outbound routing (with redundancy) joel jaeggli (Oct 05)
- Re: Regarding source based outbound routing (with redundancy) Christopher Morrow (Oct 05)