nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS Reliability
From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon () cox net>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:00:16 -0500
On 9/13/2013 2:14 AM, Marco Davids (Prive) wrote:
On 09/13/13 03:53, Larry Sheldon wrote:On 9/12/2013 3:25 PM, Phil Fagan wrote:Its a good point about the anycast; 99.999% should be expected.A small choice of attitude-reflecting language. I expect 100.000% I'll accept 99.999% or better.It depends... define 'lost queries'. For example; is RRL included here or not (sometimes you want to deliberatly 'loose' queries).
I do not ever set any amount of failure as an objective. I usually have a specified tolerance for failure. If for some odd circumstance I wan to discard queries, that would involve knowing exactly what happened to them--not loosing them.
-- Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics of System Administrators: Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to learn from their mistakes. (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)
Current thread:
- DNS Reliability Phil Fagan (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability Bryan Tong (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability Beavis (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability Phil Fagan (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability Glen Wiley (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability Phil Fagan (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability Phil Fagan (Sep 12)
- Message not available
- Re: DNS Reliability Larry Sheldon (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability Marco Davids (Prive) (Sep 13)
- Message not available
- Re: DNS Reliability Larry Sheldon (Sep 13)
- Re: DNS Reliability Phil Fagan (Sep 13)
- Re: DNS Reliability Jean-Francois Mezei (Sep 13)
- Re: DNS Reliability Joe Abley (Sep 13)
- Re: DNS Reliability bmanning (Sep 13)
- Re: DNS Reliability Niels Bakker (Sep 16)
- Re: DNS Reliability Nick Hilliard (Sep 16)
- Re: DNS Reliability bmanning (Sep 23)
- Re: DNS Reliability Phil Fagan (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability Eric Brunner-Williams (Sep 12)