nanog mailing list archives
Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region
From: Geoff Huston <gih () apnic net>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 23:28:58 +1000
On 23/09/2013, at 8:01 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> wrote:
On 23/09/2013 00:15, John Curran wrote:Not being able to use 32-bit ASNs in your network and support systems will inevitably lead to confusion for those customers who are assigned them.I look forward to the day when we have proper 32 bit BGP community support and ASN32s finally become usable on nontrivial networks.
Is there some reference that describes the problems with the use of RFC5668? I was not aware that there were residual issues here. regards, Geoff
Current thread:
- Weekly Routing Table Report Routing Analysis Role Account (Sep 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Weekly Routing Table Report Routing Analysis Role Account (Sep 13)
- Weekly Routing Table Report Routing Analysis Role Account (Sep 20)
- 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region (was: Re: Weekly Routing Table Report) John Curran (Sep 22)
- Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region Nick Hilliard (Sep 23)
- Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region Geoff Huston (Sep 23)
- Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region Job Snijders (Sep 23)
- Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region Geoff Huston (Sep 23)
- Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region Nick Hilliard (Sep 23)
- RE: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region R. Benjamin Kessler (Sep 23)
- Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region Nick Hilliard (Sep 23)
- RE: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region Leo Vegoda (Sep 23)
- 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region (was: Re: Weekly Routing Table Report) John Curran (Sep 22)
- Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 23)