nanog mailing list archives
RE: minimum IPv6 announcement size
From: "Otis L. Surratt, Jr." <otis () ocosa com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:47:24 -0500
-----Original Message----- From: Nathanael C. Cariaga [mailto:nccariaga () stluke com ph] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 8:50 AM To: NANOG Mailing List Subject: minimum IPv6 announcement size
Hi, Just wondering if anyone could shed light on my concern..... I've been Google-ing about if there is such a standard that sets the
minimum IPv6 advertisement on BGP. My concern is that I am running a network that is operating on multiple sites and currently rolling >out our IPv6 on the perimeter level. Having to get our /48 allocation from our RIR, I figured out I would it would be best for us to break down the
/48 into smaller chunks (i.e /56s) and farm it out to our sites since a
single /48 will be very big for our single site.
Any advise will be very much appreciated. Regards, -- -nathan
Minimum announcement for IPv6 as I recall is /48. Some providers might accept less for their networks. -Otis
Current thread:
- minimum IPv6 announcement size Nathanael C. Cariaga (Sep 24)
- RE: minimum IPv6 announcement size Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size joel jaeggli (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Ben (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Randy Bush (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Edward Dore (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Owen DeLong (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Bryan Socha (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Nathanael C. Cariaga (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size joel jaeggli (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Måns Nilsson (Sep 24)
- RE: minimum IPv6 announcement size Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Sep 24)