nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGPMON Alert Questions
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 16:12:29 +0200
On Thursday, April 03, 2014 02:57:31 PM Nick Hilliard wrote:
I'm currently seeing ~100 prefixes originating from 4761, and an additional 725 transited through 4761. This would not be difficult to handle with prefix lists, assuming some level of automation.
Indeed. I, for example, have an upstream that filters only on AS_PATH. Naturally, we are quite aggressive and insistent about filtering both on AS_PATH and prefix list across interconnects to our downstreams, but if things were to blow up on our side, the upstream in question would not be protected (unless, of course, they are relying on "max- prefix" as well). Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions, (continued)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Nick Hilliard (Apr 04)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Sharon Goldberg (Apr 04)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 05)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Sharon Goldberg (Apr 06)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 06)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Benno Overeinder (Apr 04)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 05)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Anthony Williams (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Nick Hilliard (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Randy Bush (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Jac Kloots (Apr 08)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 08)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Jac Kloots (Apr 08)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 08)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Randy Bush (Apr 10)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 10)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Randy Bush (Apr 10)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 10)