nanog mailing list archives
RE: BGPMON Alert Questions
From: Vitkovský Adam <adam.vitkovsky () swan sk>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 07:58:42 +0000
That Upstream B is simply "accepting everything" their customer is sending to them without applying proper filters, or checking to confirm that what their customer needs to send them should come from them is absolutely and unacceptably shocking!
I wonder when (or if ever) we'll have such a discussion about data packets, i.e. finding that someone is not doing packet-filtering based on BGP updates is absolutely and unacceptably shocking! adam
Current thread:
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions, (continued)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Curtis Doty (Apr 02)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Peter Tavenier (Apr 02)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions James Laszko (Apr 02)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Bob Evans (Apr 02)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Seth Mattinen (Apr 02)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Bryan Tong (Apr 02)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Laszlo Hanyecz (Apr 02)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Justin M. Streiner (Apr 02)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions joel jaeggli (Apr 02)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 03)
- RE: BGPMON Alert Questions Vitkovský Adam (Apr 04)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 05)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Andree Toonk (Apr 02)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Randy Bush (Apr 02)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Barry Greene (Apr 02)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Barry Greene (Apr 02)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions ML (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Nick Hilliard (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Randy Bush (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 03)