nanog mailing list archives
Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage
From: "Kee Hinckley" <nazgul () marrowbones com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:22:24 -0400
On 10 Apr 2014, at 9:49, Dave Crocker wrote:
Unfortunately, that has no relationship to do with the current situation. Again: Yahoo was fully aware of the implications of its choice.
I suspect they looked at the amount of spam they could stop, the number of Yahoo email users, and the number of Yahoo users using mailing lists, and said "That's just noise, it doesn't matter."
It happens to be very loud noise, but it's still tiny compared to the overall number of email users.
Current thread:
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage, (continued)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Geoffrey Keating (Apr 10)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Dave Crocker (Apr 20)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Elizabeth Zwicky (Apr 21)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Jim Popovitch (Apr 21)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Miles Fidelman (Apr 21)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Jim Popovitch (Apr 25)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Jim Popovitch (Apr 25)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Jim Popovitch (Apr 25)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Dave Crocker (Apr 10)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Kee Hinckley (Apr 10)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Rich Kulawiec (Apr 11)