nanog mailing list archives
Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:00:34 -0400
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:32:38 -0000, "Eric C. Miller" said:
I thought that keeping up with the times is part of basic necessity of business.
Yes, but here in the US, a precedent got set when some communications companies got given really sweet deals to encourage them to deploy next-gen broadband, and the companies instead pocketed the money. We're kind of stuck with this sort of thing until Wall Street stops emphasizing quarterly profits over long-term strategic development.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: Akamai charges for IPv6 support?, (continued)
- RE: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Mehmet Akcin (Aug 18)
- RE: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Clayton Zekelman (Aug 18)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Brent Jones (Aug 18)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Alejandro Acosta (Aug 18)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Matthew Kaufman (Aug 18)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Mark Andrews (Aug 18)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Justin M. Streiner (Aug 18)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Rubens Kuhl (Aug 18)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Justin M. Streiner (Aug 18)
- RE: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Eric C. Miller (Aug 19)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 19)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Aaron Hopkins (Aug 18)