nanog mailing list archives
Re: QOS improvement suggestion for NANOG list members
From: Mike A <mikea () mikea ath cx>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 13:34:58 -0500
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 06:09:50PM +0000, Sholes, Joshua wrote:
Doesn't everyone do that? NANOG was the list that taught me, twelve years ago, that I would suffer terribly if I didn't pre-sort individual mailing lists into their own folders. =)
Procmail, while not all that _friendly_, can be *useful*. -- Mike Andrews, W5EGO mikea () mikea ath cx Tired old sysadmin
Current thread:
- Re: Urgent, (continued)
- Re: Urgent Tom Hill (Aug 19)
- Re: Urgent Scott Weeks (Aug 18)
- Re: Urgent Jeroen van Aart (Aug 18)
- Re: Urgent mcfbbqroast . (Aug 18)
- Re: Urgent Michael Hallgren (Aug 18)
- Re: Urgent Jeroen van Aart (Aug 18)
- Re: Urgent William Herrin (Aug 19)
- QOS improvement suggestion for NANOG list members Rob McEwen (Aug 19)
- Re: QOS improvement suggestion for NANOG list members Doug Barton (Aug 19)
- Re: QOS improvement suggestion for NANOG list members Sholes, Joshua (Aug 19)
- Re: QOS improvement suggestion for NANOG list members Mike A (Aug 19)
- Re: QOS improvement suggestion for NANOG list members Randy Bush (Aug 20)
- Re: Urgent Jeroen van Aart (Aug 18)
- Re: QOS improvement suggestion for NANOG list members Rob McEwen (Aug 20)
- Re: Urgent Michael Hallgren (Aug 19)