nanog mailing list archives
Re: Muni Fiber and Politics
From: John Osmon <josmon () rigozsaurus com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 02:34:33 -0600
Anyone know how to summarize this end game well enough for state/federal legislators? Or raise enough money and direction to provide sufficient "lobbying?" Wasn't KC asking for a dept of the Internet at the NANOG 20 in DC? On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 09:44:28AM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Friday, August 01, 2014 09:30:57 AM mcfbbqroast . wrote:I think this is a sector the government would do well in. Unlike being an actual ISP there's no ambiguity (oversubscription, customer service, etc). Just provide a gigabit line with no congestion and solid uptime, or a fibre pair with solid uptime. End of story.Couldn't agree more :-). Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Mark Tinka (Jul 31)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics mcfbbqroast . (Jul 31)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Mark Tinka (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics mcfbbqroast . (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Mark Tinka (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics John Osmon (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Mark Tinka (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Corey Touchet (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics mcfbbqroast . (Jul 31)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Leo Bicknell (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Scott Helms (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Leo Bicknell (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 02)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Scott Helms (Aug 02)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Leo Bicknell (Aug 02)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Corey Touchet (Aug 02)