nanog mailing list archives
Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput
From: Dan Brisson <dbrisson () uvm edu>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:06:03 -0500
I think at the Internet edge, physical separation trumps logical unless you have no other choice. Personally, I would keep them separate.My Cisco SE brought up an interesting alternative. This summer we're replacing our 6513 Sup720 with a pair of 6807 with redundant Sup 2Ts. It is where all our internal Fiber terminates and where internal routing happens. He said we can add extra memory and terminate our BGP sessions here and use that for our Internet connections. After thinking it over, I'd still rather have dedicated routers for our Internet access but I'm curious what you guys think about this suggestion.
My .02, -dan
Current thread:
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput, (continued)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Vlade Ristevski (Feb 10)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Remco Bressers (Feb 10)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Vlade Ristevski (Feb 10)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Octavio Alvarez (Feb 10)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Vlade Ristevski (Feb 10)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Octavio Alvarez (Feb 10)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Geraint Jones (Feb 10)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Mark Walters (Feb 11)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Nikolay Shopik (Feb 11)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Vlade Ristevski (Feb 12)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Dan Brisson (Feb 12)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Blake Hudson (Feb 13)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 12)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Mark Tinka (Feb 13)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Vlade Ristevski (Feb 10)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Mark Tinka (Feb 13)
- RE: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput John P. Schneider (Feb 10)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput joel jaeggli (Feb 10)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Mark Tinka (Feb 10)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Mark Tinka (Feb 10)