nanog mailing list archives
Re: spamassassin
From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:04:26 -0800
On 02/18/2014 05:52 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
in the last 3-4 days, a *massive* amount of spam is making it past spamassassin to my users and to me. see appended for example. not all has dkim.
It's been a while since i've been in this world, but I wonder whether bayes filters are using the public key of the dkim selector as a token. if they don't change selectors/keys they'd probably be s-canned pretty quickly. It would require that the dkim subsystem talk to the bayes subsystem since the public key isn't in the signature, so i'm guessing
not. Mike
Current thread:
- spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Private Sender (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Message not available
- Re: spamassassin Larry Sheldon (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Private Sender (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Michael Thomas (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Private Sender (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Private Sender (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Daniel Staal (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Simon Perreault (Feb 19)
- Re: spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 19)
- Re: spamassassin Gary E. Miller (Feb 19)
- Re: spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 19)