nanog mailing list archives
Re: spamassassin
From: Daniel Staal <DStaal () usa net>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 13:59:52 -0500
--As of February 20, 2014 11:22:34 AM +0800, Randy Bush is alleged to have said:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/183433as blabby as nanog, and not really specificbody BAYES_99 eval:check_bayes('0.99', '0.999') body BAYES_999 eval:check_bayes('0.999', '1.00') score BAYES_99 0 0 3.8 3.5 score BAYES_999 0 0 4.0 3.7and this is a replacement for both 999 and 99?
--As for the rest, it is mine.It's a redefinition of both, yes. It was partly given in the original thread as a help to understand what was happening - and it was listed as a *temporary* fix, until the rule has been stabilized.
Discussion on both of these rules is ongoing at the moment, and I wouldn't advise the above fix unless you are following it. It's likely that it will double-score some of your spam, or drastically change the meanings of the rules from what is shipped, if not now than soon. Putting the 'score' lines in your local.cf or user_prefs should be fine, but I'd avoid the definition lines. (`/etc/mail/spmassassin/local.cf` is the usual main editable config file for spamassissin, and `~/.spamassassin/user_prefs` is per-user configs, if you have that.)
The correct score has been pushed, as Simon Perreault mentioned. Taking out anything you've done and running sa-update should get you a working ruleset. (If you've increased the score of either one in the normal fashions - using local.cf or user_prefs - that should be fine.)
Daniel T. Staal --------------------------------------------------------------- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. ---------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: spamassassin, (continued)
- Re: spamassassin Private Sender (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Private Sender (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Daniel Staal (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Simon Perreault (Feb 19)
- Re: spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 19)
- Re: spamassassin Gary E. Miller (Feb 19)
- Re: spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 19)
- Re: spamassassin Michael Butler (Feb 19)
- Re: spamassassin Daniel Staal (Feb 20)
- Re: spamassassin Daniel Staal (Feb 20)
- Re: spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 20)
- Re: spamassassin Andris Kalnozols (Feb 19)
- Re: spamassassin Simon Perreault (Feb 20)