nanog mailing list archives

Re: Filter NTP traffic by packet size?


From: Cb B <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 01:07:18 -0800

On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo () tzi org> wrote:
On 22 Feb 2014, at 08:47, Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi> wrote:

I'm surprised MinimaLT and QUIC have have not put transport area people in
high gear towards standardization of new PKI based L4 protocol, I think its
elegant solution to many practical reoccurring problem, solution which has
become practical only rather recently.

Oh, the transport area people *are* in their high gear.
Their frantic movements may just seem static to you as they operate on more drawn-out time scales.
(The last transport protocol I worked on became standards-track 16 years after I started working on it.)

At this IETF, there will be a "Transport Services" BOF to help find out what exactly the services are that a new 
transport protocol should provide to the applications.  Research platforms such as QUIC, tcpcrypt, MINION etc. are 
very much in the focus of attention.

This time, it would be nice if the operations people got to have a say early on in what gets standardized.
(Just be careful not to try to "fight yesterday's war".)

Grüße, Carsten



yesterday's war = don't bring up that operators are having a real
problem with UDP, and that operators have and will continue to block
it?  Because, i think that is what this thread is about.

i did bring yesterday's war to the IETF RTCWweb group and got the
expected answer

My concern:

https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg11425.html

Summary IETF response:  The problem i described is already solved by
bcp38, nothing to see here, carry on with UDP

 https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg11477.html

CB


Current thread: