nanog mailing list archives
Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 21:43:18 +0200
On Monday, January 06, 2014 08:24:22 PM Nick Hilliard wrote:
except qos (which needs switch port buffer space). There are no cheap 10G boxes on the market at the moment which have reasonable numbers of 10G ports and reasonable sized. Plenty which have 2-4 10G ports with reasonable buffers and lots more which have plenty of 10G ports with hardly any buffer space.
FIB space requirements in a switch are also going to limit your options. Also, many "non-service provider" switches don't do egress policing (they might do shaping, but then if the buffers are small...). Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation randal k (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Adrian Minta (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Nick Hilliard (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Mark Tinka (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Nitzan Tzelniker (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Randy Bush (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Mark Tinka (Jan 08)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Nick Hilliard (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Nick Hilliard (Jan 07)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Mark Tinka (Jan 08)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Adrian Minta (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Mark Tinka (Jan 08)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation joel jaeggli (Jan 08)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Mark Tinka (Jan 08)