nanog mailing list archives
Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches
From: Eugeniu Patrascu <eugen () imacandi net>
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 23:51:15 +0200
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi> wrote:
On (2013-12-31 23:04 +0000), Warren Bailey wrote:that RSA had a check cut for their participation (sell outs..), would it be out of the realm of possibility cisco knowingly placed this into their product line? And would it be their mistake to come out with a “we had no idea!” rather than “guys with badges and court orders made us do it!”?Is this legal? Can NSA walk in to US based company and legally coerce to install such backdoor? If not, what is the incentive for private company to cooperate?
As you might have seen from the beginning of time, people in power assume anything can go until proven otherwise.
Current thread:
- Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches Florian Weimer (Dec 31)
- Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches Paul Ferguson (Dec 31)
- Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches Warren Bailey (Dec 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches Saku Ytti (Jan 01)
- Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches Randy Bush (Jan 01)
- Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 01)
- Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches Jimmy Hess (Jan 01)
- Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches Eugeniu Patrascu (Jan 01)
- Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches Saku Ytti (Jan 02)
- Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches Eugeniu Patrascu (Jan 02)
- Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches Paul Ferguson (Dec 31)
- Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches Brandon Butterworth (Jan 01)
- Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches Marco Teixeira (Jan 01)