nanog mailing list archives

Re: Proxy ARP detection


From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 23:21:00 -0500

Excellent. So all everyone has to do is not buy cisco _or_ juniper.

Wait a minute....

-- 
TTFN,
patrick


On Jan 15, 2014, at 19:54 , Eric Rosen <erosen () redhat com> wrote:

Cisco PIX's used to do this if the firewall had a route and saw a ARP request in that IP range it would proxy arp.

----- Original Message -----

On Jan 15, 2014, at 4:03 PM, Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net> wrote:

* clay () bloomcounty org (Clay Fiske) [Thu 16 Jan 2014, 00:59 CET]:
This is where theory diverges nicely from practice. In some cases the
offender broadcast his reply, and guess what else? A lot of routers
listen to unsolicited ARP replies.

I've never seen this.  Please name vendor and product, if only so other
subscribers to this list can avoid doing business with them.

This was some time ago, but the two I was able to dig up from that case were
both Junipers. Perhaps it’s something that only happens when proxy ARP is
enabled?


-c




-- 
Eric Rosen
CCIE Security #17821
Information Security Analyst
Red Hat, Inc
erosen () redhat com
919.890.8555 x48555
IRC erosen






Current thread: