nanog mailing list archives
Re: Net Neutrality...
From: Brett Glass <nanog () brettglass com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:08:58 -0600
At 12:19 PM 7/15/2014, Barry Shein wrote:
There exists a low and high (practical) bandwidth range within which it simply doesn't make any difference to a given business model.
Very true. And there's another factor to consider. Estimates of the maximum bandwidths of all the human senses, combined, range between the capacity of a T1 line (at the low end) and about 4 Mbps (at the high end). A human being simply is not wired to accept more input. (Yes, machines could digest more... which means that additional bandwidth to and from the home might be useful for the purpose of spying on us.) What does this imply about the FCC's proposal to redefine "broadband" as a symmetrical 10 Mbps? --Brett
Current thread:
- Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix, (continued)
- Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix Miles Fidelman (Jul 13)
- Net Neutrality... John Curran (Jul 14)
- RE: Net Neutrality... Naslund, Steve (Jul 14)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Miles Fidelman (Jul 14)
- Re: Net Neutrality... manning (Jul 15)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Graham Donaldson (Jul 15)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Ray Soucy (Jul 15)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Graham Donaldson (Jul 15)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Blake Dunlap (Jul 15)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Barry Shein (Jul 15)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Brett Glass (Jul 15)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Doug Barton (Jul 15)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Brett Glass (Jul 15)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Doug Barton (Jul 15)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Rubens Kuhl (Jul 15)
- Message not available
- Re: Net Neutrality... Brett Glass (Jul 15)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Fletcher Kittredge (Jul 15)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Bob Evans (Jul 15)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Brett Glass (Jul 15)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Bob Evans (Jul 15)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Fletcher Kittredge (Jul 16)