nanog mailing list archives

Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity


From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 21:02:08 -0400

On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:10:09 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian said:
The debate is dominated by the parties of the first part unfortunately (and
add professors of law to this already toxic mix)

So what you're saying is that the debate is in total violation of
RFC1925, section 4? :)

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: