nanog mailing list archives
Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman () meetinghouse net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 08:53:05 -0400
Bill Woodcock wrote:
On Jul 27, 2014, at 9:39 PM, Miles Fidelman <mfidelman () meetinghouse net> wrote:Can you say more about what you've done to "survey and quantify" prevailing practices?https://www.pch.net/resources/papers//peering-survey/PCH-Peering-Survey-2011.pdf We’ll do another one in the run-up to the next OECD carrier interconnection paper.
Interesting study. Thanks for the pointer.
Given that Netflix is reportedly about 1/3 of Internet traffic these days, and Verizon is huge - how does that come out to .27% of cases?Netflix/Verizon would be 0.0007% of cases, if it’s represented in the dataset. The survey was of interconnection norms, not of hugeness.
It is worth noting, though, that not all interconnection are created equal. I wonder how your numbers would come out if you grouped interconnection agreements by amount of traffic exchanged, level of asymmetry, and so forth. And then perhaps by level of competition in the associated markets (do monopoly carriers behave differently than ones where there is a lot of competition?).
Just by analogy, the answer to "what kind of protocol traffic dominates the net" (or is "more important") differs considerably if you look at bandwidth vs. transactions (last time I looked, admittedly a little while ago, email still dominates network traffic when you look at transactions; but video clearly eats of most of the bandwidth).
Regards, Miles Fidelman -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
Current thread:
- Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity, (continued)
- Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 25)
- Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity Matthew Petach (Jul 26)
- Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity Richard Bennett (Jul 27)
- Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity Joly MacFie (Jul 27)
- Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity Richard Bennett (Jul 27)
- Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity Joly MacFie (Jul 27)
- Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity Richard Bennett (Jul 27)
- Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity Bill Woodcock (Jul 27)
- Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity Miles Fidelman (Jul 27)
- Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity Bill Woodcock (Jul 27)
- Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity Miles Fidelman (Jul 28)
- Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity Joly MacFie (Jul 27)
- Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity William Herrin (Jul 28)
- Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity Bill Woodcock (Jul 28)
- Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity Jay Ashworth (Jul 28)
- Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity Bill Woodcock (Jul 28)
- Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity Dorian Kim (Jul 28)
- Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity Matthew Petach (Jul 28)
- Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity Matt Palmer (Jul 27)
- Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity Richard Bennett (Jul 27)
- Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity Miles Fidelman (Jul 27)
- Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity Paul WALL (Jul 27)