nanog mailing list archives
Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering
From: James R Cutler <james.cutler () consultant com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:52:46 -0400
On Jun 18, 2014, at 7:37 PM, Daniel Ankers <md1clv () md1clv com> wrote:
On 18 June 2014 19:05, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:OTOH, it's far better than those ridiculous providers that are screwing over their customers with /56s or even worse, /60s. Sad, really. OwenIs giving a /56 to residential customers REALLY "screwing them over"? It may be a failure of imagination on my part, but I'm struggling to come up with use cases for the home which would take up even 10% of the networks available in a /56. And if the vast, vast majority of home users will never come close to needing the whole of a /56 then I don't see why every home should be given a /48. Dan
Responding to Dan, The costs incurred in managing variable subnetting based on user type have been clearly demonstrated in almost two decades of IPv4 networking. If I can assign a /48 to each and every customer (not considered a large enterprise) then my deployment costs plummet because I do NOT need to spend engineering time on address assignment. I only need to get out my Network Engineer’s binary knife to slice the address pie once. The same front office that takes the order can at the same time assign the IPv6 Prefix - sort of like Ma Bell does with phone numbers. Since one of my goals as a network provider is to be competitive in price, minimizing extraneous labor costs helps me to still make a modest profit. James R. Cutler James.cutler () consultant com PGP keys at http://pgp.mit.edu
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Current thread:
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering, (continued)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Mark Tinka (Jun 18)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering jamie rishaw (Jun 17)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering John Levine (Jun 17)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering manning bill (Jun 17)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Daniel Ankers (Jun 18)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering John Levine (Jun 18)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Owen DeLong (Jun 18)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering John R. Levine (Jun 18)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Lee Howard (Jun 18)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Daniel Ankers (Jun 18)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering James R Cutler (Jun 18)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Gary Buhrmaster (Jun 18)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Owen DeLong (Jun 19)
- RE: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering STARNES, CURTIS (Jun 19)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 19)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Daniel Ankers (Jun 19)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Peter Kristolaitis (Jun 19)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Harald Koch (Jun 19)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Owen DeLong (Jun 19)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 19)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Daniel Ankers (Jun 19)