nanog mailing list archives
Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering
From: James R Cutler <james.cutler () consultant com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 14:41:47 -0400
On Jun 19, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Daniel Ankers <md1clv () md1clv com> wrote:
One of the key things with IPv6 (IMHO) is to stop thinking about addresses, and instead just think about networks. Judging by Owen's earlier mail I may not have that quite right and the key might even be to think about hierarchies - in either case counting the number of individual addresses is something we just don't need to do any more. Dan
s/think about networks/think about subnetworks (colloquial: LAN Segments)/ With IPv6, the number of hosts in a subnet is (should be) no longer a driver for addressing.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Current thread:
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering, (continued)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Gary Buhrmaster (Jun 18)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Owen DeLong (Jun 19)
- RE: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering STARNES, CURTIS (Jun 19)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 19)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Daniel Ankers (Jun 19)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Peter Kristolaitis (Jun 19)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Harald Koch (Jun 19)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Owen DeLong (Jun 19)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 19)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Daniel Ankers (Jun 19)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering James R Cutler (Jun 19)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Laszlo Hanyecz (Jun 19)
- Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering Bryan Socha (Jun 17)