nanog mailing list archives
Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 23:54:22 +0100
* web () typo org (Wayne E Bouchard) [Tue 18 Mar 2014, 23:53 CET]:
I have had to do this at times but it is not strictly allowed by codes and not at all recommended.
It's an active fire hazard. The cables aren't rated (= built) for the power draw.
-- Niels.
Current thread:
- L6-20P -> L6-30R Randy (Mar 18)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Mike Hale (Mar 18)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Wayne E Bouchard (Mar 18)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Niels Bakker (Mar 18)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Stephen Sprunk (Mar 18)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Randy Carpenter (Mar 18)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Jay Ashworth (Mar 18)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Laszlo Hanyecz (Mar 18)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Wayne E Bouchard (Mar 18)
- RE: L6-20P -> L6-30R Alex Rubenstein (Mar 18)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Rob Seastrom (Mar 19)
- RE: L6-20P -> L6-30R Alex Rubenstein (Mar 19)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Rob Seastrom (Mar 19)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Mike Hale (Mar 18)
- Message not available
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Larry Sheldon (Mar 19)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R William Herrin (Mar 18)