nanog mailing list archives

Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)


From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2014 23:41:00 +0200

On Saturday, May 03, 2014 07:24:24 PM Vitkovský Adam wrote:

Sure it's a different transport protocol altogether,
anyways It's interesting to see how everybody tends to
separate the IPv4 and IPv6 AFs onto a different TCP
sessions and still run the plethora of other AFs on the
common v4 TCP session, maybe apart from couple of the
big folks, who can afford running separate control-plane
and edge infrastructure for some of the AFs, IPv6 AF
being the first ran separately.

We run separate AF's for each family-type, i.e., IPv4 
separate from IPv6, separate from VPNv4 separate from BGP-
based VPLS, e.t.c.

Mark.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Current thread: