nanog mailing list archives
Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2014 23:41:00 +0200
On Saturday, May 03, 2014 07:24:24 PM Vitkovský Adam wrote:
Sure it's a different transport protocol altogether, anyways It's interesting to see how everybody tends to separate the IPv4 and IPv6 AFs onto a different TCP sessions and still run the plethora of other AFs on the common v4 TCP session, maybe apart from couple of the big folks, who can afford running separate control-plane and edge infrastructure for some of the AFs, IPv6 AF being the first ran separately.
We run separate AF's for each family-type, i.e., IPv4 separate from IPv6, separate from VPNv4 separate from BGP- based VPLS, e.t.c. Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack), (continued)
- Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack) Laszlo Hanyecz (May 02)
- Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack) Ryan Wilkins (May 02)
- Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack) Måns Nilsson (May 02)
- Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack) Owen DeLong (May 02)
- Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack) Eugeniu Patrascu (May 02)
- Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack) Paul S. (May 02)
- RE: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack) Vitkovský Adam (May 03)
- RE: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack) Mikael Abrahamsson (May 03)
- Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack) Michael Hallgren (May 03)
- Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack) Mark Tinka (May 04)
- Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack) Mark Tinka (May 04)
- RE: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack) Mikael Abrahamsson (May 03)
- Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack) Laszlo Hanyecz (May 02)